Tom Goldstein, a renowned figure in the legal community and publisher of SCOTUSblog, faces serious allegations of tax evasion. Federal authorities in Maryland have charged him with failing to report millions of dollars in poker winnings. The indictment claims Goldstein used funds from his law firm to settle gambling debts, misrepresented his income on tax returns, and made false statements to secure a substantial loan.
Goldstein, who has appeared before the Supreme Court more frequently than nearly any other private practice attorney in modern history, co-founded SCOTUSblog with Amy Howe in 2002. His extensive legal career includes teaching at Harvard Law School and representing high-profile clients, such as then-Vice President Al Gore in the Bush v. Gore case and Google in a copyright dispute. However, these recent charges cast a shadow over his illustrious career.
The indictment details that Goldstein allegedly understated his gambling winnings by over $3.9 million on his 2016 federal tax return and omitted more than $3.4 million in gambling income for 2017. In addition to these accusations, he is accused of pursuing personal relationships with several women, covering their travel and related expenses while owing substantial tax debts.
"Goldstein's false statements to one of the mortgage lenders allegedly resulted in his obtaining a $1.98 million loan."
The allegations extend beyond tax evasion. Authorities claim Goldstein submitted false mortgage applications to two mortgage lenders to finance a $2.6 million home in Washington, D.C. His false declarations reportedly led to him securing a $1.98 million loan from one lender.
"diverted legal fees owed to his Bethesda, Maryland, law firm, Goldstein & Russell, to pay his poker-related debts."
The indictment also accuses Goldstein of using more than $1.1 million from his law firm, Goldstein & Russell, to cover personal obligations in 2016, including significant gambling debts. This misuse of funds further complicates the legal challenges he faces.
"submitted false mortgage applications to two separate mortgage lending companies, seeking financing to purchase a $2.6 million home in Washington, D.C."
Goldstein's case highlights the intersection of personal conduct and professional responsibility within the legal field. As the legal proceedings unfold, the implications for his career and reputation remain uncertain. The charges underscore the severity of financial misconduct and its potential consequences for individuals in positions of trust and influence.