Benjamin Franklin's foresight regarding the potential despotism of the United States Constitution, established in 1787, finds resonance in contemporary reflections. Nesrine Malik, in an article published on February 3, voiced concerns about the American Constitution. Her views align with those of a writer who had previously engaged in thought-provoking conversations with a top BBC executive. The executive, during an interview, addressed the notion that the BBC World Service functions as a British propaganda tool.
"Yes, it is. But it’s a very subtle form of propaganda. It’s called telling the truth." – A top BBC executive
The writer echoes Malik's sentiment, asserting that the US has consistently exhibited characteristics of despotism. This perspective draws from the belief that the founding document's trajectory inevitably leads to such governance. Historical reflections also bring to light a colleague's candid comment on a troublemaker from the 1960s, describing them as "indolent, insolent, and ignorant." The writer concurs with this characterization, viewing it as an accurate depiction.
In a broader context, the United States' allocation of $2.3 trillion on the Afghanistan war is scrutinized. The writer suggests that this sum could have been alternatively utilized, for instance, by providing every individual in Gaza with a million dollars to facilitate relocation. This critical examination underscores the writer's agreement with Franklin's prediction, positioning it as a testament to the Constitution's influence on national policies.
"I am afraid John is doing his best." – A maths teacher
John Saxbee's letter to the editor serves as a response to the writer's report, reflecting ongoing dialogues about governance and societal direction. As debates continue, these discussions illuminate the complexities surrounding foundational documents and their long-term implications.