The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) is confronting a wave of sexual abuse allegations that have emerged in California, shaking the institution to its core. Five plaintiffs have come forward alleging abuse in San Diego County, with three asserting that the top spiritual leaders of their congregations sexually assaulted them. The lawsuits have proliferated to such an extent that attorneys are seeking to consolidate these actions into a single multi-district litigation in the Central District of California.
The unique structure and influence of the LDS Church are significant elements in these allegations. With a hierarchical system, the church wields considerable power over its members' lives. This influence can create challenges for victims who wish to report abuse, as loyalty and obedience to church leaders are heavily emphasized. According to Michael Carney, a Los Angeles attorney, "how much power and influence the church has over people’s lives" is a critical factor in these cases.
The church's general handbook instructs leaders to stop abuse, help victims receive care, and comply with legal reporting requirements. However, there are allegations suggesting that a church "help line" was misused to suppress reports and shield abusers rather than assist victims. This has compounded concerns about accountability within the church.
A three-year legal window in California has led to nearly 100 allegations of childhood sexual abuse by Mormon leaders. The hierarchical nature of the church complicates the process of proving liability, as its leaders hold significant control over members' lives. This control can make it difficult for victims to leave the church or report abuse.
Wendy Murphy describes this situation as "unbelievable natural insulation from accountability and oversight," highlighting the challenges faced by those seeking justice. Mitchell Garabedian echoes these sentiments, stating, "Institutions are icebergs unto themselves, so the real change comes from the public realizing that institutions are not properly supervising and protecting children."
The LDS Church has publicly stated its dedication to addressing abuse. An LDS church spokesperson emphasized, "abuse of a child or any other individual is inexcusable," and affirmed that "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believes this, teaches this, and dedicates tremendous resources and efforts to prevent, report, and address abuse." The spokesperson also noted that the church is taking the claims seriously and investigating each case individually. However, they mentioned that early investigations have revealed "multiple discrepancies in many of the claims."
Despite these assurances, allegations persist regarding the church's history of covering up abuse and protecting abusers. This has contributed to a growing public awareness that vigilance is necessary in safeguarding children from institutional failures. Garabedian further stressed that "the public is now more aware that they have to watch their children," pointing to a shift in societal attitudes towards institutional accountability.
The plaintiffs' stories paint a grim picture of manipulation and intimidation. One account describes how an alleged victim was told that "if he kept quiet, he would go to heaven, but if he told of the abuse, he would go to hell." Another narrative reveals the pressure faced by family members, with one person reportedly informed "that he needed to support his son’s abuser or risk being excommunicated from the church."
The LDS general handbook advises leaders to "not involve themselves in civil or criminal cases for members in their units without first consulting with Church legal counsel." This directive raises questions about the extent of institutional involvement in addressing abuse allegations.