The Australian government just passed a groundbreaking new law. It prohibits minors under the age of 16 from using social media companies. The legislation, aimed at protecting minors from the potential harms associated with online interactions, has sparked mixed reactions among families and advocates across the nation. Supporters argue that the ban would serve to protect young people. Critics fear that it’s harming social bonds and women and racial minorities.
Jonathan Haidt’s book, The Anxious Generation, was the background inspiration for that law. It illustrates the corrosive effects that social media is having on the mental health of young people. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese initially expressed robust backing for the deal. He made a beautiful case for protecting childhood innocence in a world that seems more digital every day. “We must take steps to ensure our children can grow up free from the pressures and dangers posed by social media,” he stated.
One of those directly impacted by the new legislation is Jacinta Hickey, a 14-year-old from Sydney. Jacinta thinks that she is old enough to know the risks of using social media platforms. She said she was annoyed by the idea that young people are simply incapable of using these new online platforms in a responsible way. “It’s insulting they think we can’t handle it,” she remarked. Like Jacinta, most teens believe they don’t need to be told what to do—especially not when it comes to social media.
Breanna Easton, another teen affected by the ban, feels similarly. Social media, in her opinion, is very important for being able to connect with others and express yourself. Having grown up in the digital world, she knows the lasting potential it can unlock. Her mother, Megan Easton, is ambivalent about the new legislation. Megan knows that there are dangers of social media. At the same time, she is concerned that restricting access will leave her daughter unable to relate to her peers.
The tragic case of Tilly, a 14-year-old who took her own life after experiencing online bullying, has further fueled discussions surrounding the ban. Emma, Tilly’s mother, publicly blamed social media for her daughter’s death, highlighting the devastating consequences that can arise from cyberbullying. Emma Mason, an energetic campaigner for the new law, is confident it will lead to many more good results than bad. She advocates fiercely for the protection of our most vulnerable youth.
Sadie Angus Sadie, 14, connects with friends and accesses support networks via social media. She is worried about the ban. Sadie’s meaningful connection with her friends increasingly happens through social media. Importantly, it makes her—and millions of others like her—more likely to seek help in a crisis. By Lola Farrugia, 12, who is not yet on social media. She may miss out, unable to participate until she reaches the age of 16. This age restriction touches on important issues regarding the nature of adolescence and how youth social dynamics are changing.
Critics of the ban counter that it would disproportionately affect minority communities. This is particularly alarming for LGBTQ+ youth, who increasingly rely on social media for community and connection. Sharon Fraser, CEO of Reframing Autism, voiced her concerns regarding how the ban may impact autistic young people seeking connection and understanding online. Fraser stressed the importance of equitable access for all young people to these resources. He too can’t overemphasize the importance of identity affirming communities.
With implementation of the law now underway, parents and educators have a new battle to wage. In an unprecedented move, children are now banned from using all the major social media platforms. The government urges families to have honest conversations about staying safe online and improving mental wellbeing. Finding the right balance between protection and autonomy continues to be a complex challenge.