Boris Johnson has once again stirred the political landscape with his vocal defense of former U.S. President Donald Trump. In his latest column for the Daily Mail, Johnson described critics of Trump as "ridiculous, panicking, hysterical, whingeing headless chickens," arguing that Trump's presidency represented a "last chance to save the decaying west from terminal decline." This comes amidst ongoing discussions about Trump's controversial actions and statements, particularly his televised interactions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which some see as politically sophisticated maneuvers.
Johnson's comments arrive at a time when Trump's political legacy continues to polarize opinions. Notably, Trump's refusal to provide military assistance to Ukraine—an action some describe as "creative"—and his alleged appeasement of Russian interests have raised eyebrows. Despite these controversies, Johnson's portrayal of Trump as a courteous and well-mannered individual stands in contrast to the widespread criticism of Trump's demeanor and policies.
"You should never have started it."
— Trump (to Zelenskyy)
Trump's history of misogyny is another point of contention. High-profile female politicians like Nadine Dorries, Suella Braverman, and Liz Truss appear willing to overlook these behaviors. Braverman has gone so far as to describe Trump's latest actions as "a wake-up call for European nations," suggesting a belief in his strategic acumen despite past allegations of sexism, such as the infamous "Grab 'em by the pussy" remark.
In the British media, opinions on Trump are varied. Allister Heath of the Telegraph hailed Trump's victory as "a success for democracy" and for "free speech," a sentiment echoed by certain segments of the British political landscape. However, when UK legislators express admiration for Trump, it often raises questions about their suitability for political office, with critics implying they are "unworthy of political office."
“A glimmer of hope of what is possible in the west.”
— Suella Braverman
The relationship between Trump and Russia remains a focal point of debate. Trump's rapid transition into what some perceive as full allyship with Russia has left even his staunchest supporters scrambling for justification. While Trump's denial of military assistance to Ukraine is rationalized by some as a tactic to provoke European nations into action, it also enhances his image as an "amoral racist and conspiracy theorist" among detractors.
“I have always found him, personally, a model of old-fashioned courtesy and good manners.”
— Boris Johnson
Polling indicates that Johnson's linguistic endeavors to defend Trump may finally be gaining traction. Johnson's efforts seem to be resonating with certain audiences, potentially reshaping perceptions of Trump's contentious legacy. However, this alignment with Trump is not without its risks. The specter of Lord Rothermere's past support for Germany's Nazi party looms over Johnson’s endorsements, reminding observers of the potential pitfalls in aligning too closely with controversial figures.
Trump's statements often aim to provoke rather than adhere to historical accuracy, a strategy that continues to shock and spur European nations into reassessment. His actions and rhetoric have forced allies and critics alike to re-evaluate their stances on global affairs and international relations.