A recent poll reveals that only a mere 13 percent of Canadians express any desire to join the United States under Donald Trump’s leadership. The findings underscore a significant lack of enthusiasm for such a union, reflecting broader sentiments about Trump’s popularity—or lack thereof—in Canada. With stories about Trump’s electoral victory and proposed tariffs making Canadians “angriest,” the potential for any friendly merger seems increasingly unlikely. Meanwhile, Trump’s controversial policies are perceived as having already inflicted considerable damage on U.S. national security.
The idea of Canada's integration into the United States comes with complex considerations. Notably, this would require constitutional amendments, including acknowledging King Charles III as the head of the Commonwealth—a move that would essentially rebuke the Declaration of Independence. Should Canada proceed with joining, it would bring at least 10 new states into the fold, potentially shifting political dynamics within the U.S.
In a global context, the United States maintains strategic interests in the Arctic Circle, where it operates the Pituffik Space Base in Greenland. This base, formerly known as Thule Air Base, has been operational rent-free since 1951 in cooperation with NATO partners. The strategic importance of this base underscores Greenland's geopolitical significance, which could be further amplified by any formal integration with the U.S.
Greenland, an autonomous territory with a small population of 56,000, presents its own set of challenges and opportunities in this hypothetical scenario. The Inuit tribe forms the majority of Greenland's population, and their social and political fabric is deeply influenced by a socialist tradition under the leadership of Prime Minister Mute Egede. The statehood of Greenland within the U.S. would naturally bolster Democratic majorities, given its population's political leanings.
The broader implications for U.S. politics cannot be understated. If Canada and Greenland were to join the United States, the influx of Democratic voters could significantly alter the political landscape. This shift might unsettle the current balance, making the U.S. appear as an unreliable partner swayed by the whims of its leadership.
Wyoming, with its population of 584,000, is strikingly smaller than California's vast populace. The comparison highlights potential disparities and challenges in integrating new states with differing demographic profiles into the Union. While some argue that an expansion could bring diversity and new resources, others caution against the unpredictability it might introduce.
In Canada's case, leaving the Commonwealth would not be necessary if the U.S., itself a former colony, were to join as part of this hypothetical arrangement. However, such discussions remain largely theoretical and face substantial hurdles both politically and culturally.
Donald Trump remains an unpopular figure in Canada, and his proposed policies only exacerbate tensions between the two nations. His tenure has already led to contentious debates regarding tariffs and trade relations, further complicating any prospects of cross-border integration.
Trump himself has often spoken about the challenges of reversing established policies, famously stating:
"It's hard to bring things down once they're up. You know, it's very hard." – Donald Trump
This remark encapsulates some of the broader issues surrounding potential policy reversals or changes instigated during his administration.