House Republicans have unveiled a new spending bill aimed at keeping federal agencies funded through September 30, as the deadline to avert a partial government shutdown looms this Friday. The proposed legislation, which provides a slight increase in defense spending while reducing nondefense funding, does not include earmarks for community projects as requested by individual lawmakers.
The bill proposes approximately $892.5 billion for defense and around $708 billion for nondefense spending, marking a slight increase in defense programs compared to the previous year, but an 8% decrease for nondefense allocations. Despite these adjustments, the bill excludes the majority of government spending, such as Social Security and Medicare, which remain unaffected by the proposed measures.
In a strategic move, the House Republicans' leadership staff highlighted that the legislation offers the Trump administration flexibility in spending. However, it lacks side agreements that would cushion nondefense programs from budget cuts. Leadership aides confirmed that Congress must act by midnight Friday to prevent a partial shutdown.
The defense spending outlined in the bill surpasses the prior year's allocation, albeit marginally, while the nondefense budget takes a substantial cut. Furthermore, two programs will continue on autopilot without regular congressional review. This approach aligns with President Donald Trump's strategy, who has demonstrated his influence in unifying Republican support.
Despite these efforts, passing the legislation poses significant challenges, particularly in the Senate. At least seven Democrats need to support the bill to overcome a filibuster. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer emphasized the necessity of a bipartisan solution.
"We have to wait to see what their plan is. We've always believed the only solution is a bipartisan solution, no matter what." – Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer
The House plans to vote on the bill on Tuesday, even without Democratic backing. Washington Senator Patty Murray voiced opposition, expressing concerns over potential impacts on essential programs and community safety.
"We cannot stand by and accept a yearlong power grab CR that would help Elon take a chainsaw to programs that families rely on and agencies that keep our communities safe." – Washington Sen. Patty Murray
The proposed legislation aims to deliver a 1% increase in both defense and nondefense spending this year. However, its lack of funding for community projects has raised concerns among lawmakers from both parties. The absence of earmarks may hinder its acceptance among those who prioritize local initiatives.
The Republicans' decision to exclude these projects reflects their broader fiscal strategy. By focusing on defense spending and providing flexibility to the administration, they aim to maintain party unity and address national security priorities.