Matthew Scott Alder, 43, is looking at some very serious time behind bars. He’ll be tried on one count of manslaughter for a fatal shooting during a Black Lives Matter protest in Salt Lake City. The incident occurred on June 14, during a gathering organized by the “No Kings” movement, which aimed to address various social issues.
Alder then reportedly started firing shots during the protest, hitting two protestors. He opened fire, hitting the 24-year-old Arturo Gamboa. Tragically, he ended up fatally shooting Arthur “Afa” Ah Loo, who was nearby recording video of the incident, unfortunately at its tragic conclusion. Alder later explained to investigators that he felt Gamboa was about to execute a mass shooting. It was this belief that motivated his decision to use lethal force.
Although this was a serious breach of public safety, Alder was not arrested the day of the shooting. For now, his actions are the subject of intense self-review. If he’s convicted, he can expect up to 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine.
Arturo Gamboa, the man Alder shot and injured, had been holding a rifle while participating in the protest. At the time of the shooting, his attorney maintained that the gun was unloaded and being held downwards. Gamboa has been arrested in multiple public demonstrations and he usually attends while carrying his AR-15 style rifle. He won’t be charged with any crimes in connection with the incident. The district attorney only stated this was the case, in accordance with Utah state law.
Not every officer involved in a fatal shooting should be charged, but these egregious cases must see the appropriate level of accountability.
“While you may have a right to use lethal force, that doesn’t mean that lethal force can be used in a reckless manner.” – Sim Gill
It is heartbreaking accidents like the recent death of Arthur “Afa” Ah Loo that hit closest to home for the community. His family has mourned his passing and sought justice for his death. Laura Ah Loo, a family member, advocated for the charge against Alder to be dropped. She described it as “a big first step in the right direction,” while reiterating her wish that this would set the tone for safer public assemblies and protests to come.
The incident raises important issues about the use of firearms in public protests. It underlines the legal consequences of imagined threats. As the case develops, it will likely serve as a focal point for discussions about safety and responsibility during protests.