Jacob Reaume is a Canadian pastor and author who’s emerged in the last few years as something of a Christian nationalist rock star. He often promotes biblical-based conservative governance. His affiliations with different think tanks, organizations, and outlets highlight his prominence in the far-right and Christian nationalist movements in Canada. Reaume’s recent activities have ignited controversy and debate over the role of religion in politics, as well as the future of Canadian governance.
Reaume has contributed to several notable publications, including a book published by Arktos Press, which focuses on multipolarity—a concept that promotes the diversification of global power structures. His involvement with this Budapest-based publisher reflects his alignment with a growing network of conservative thinkers advocating for radical changes to societal norms. Reaume is an accomplished author, with several works published by Canon Press. This publisher was once owned by Christ Church but is now controlled completely by the Duo of Aaron Rench and Nathan Wilson.
The pastor’s involvement with Liberty Coalition Canada highlights his commitment to promoting conservative social and political policies rooted in literal interpretations of the Bible. This organization has done dangerous work to shift Canadian legislation and cultural values to the right through its extreme, fundamentalist agenda. Reaume’s vocal support for these policies has positioned him as a prominent advocate for a shift towards theocratic rule in Canada.
Controversial Statements and Actions
Reaume’s incendiary opinions have drawn major criticism, outrage, and harm. In December 2020, he expressed his enthusiasm for Donald Trump’s dicey proposal to annex Canada. He deemed it a “good and patriotic idea.” This statement, along with many others, has raised red flags about Reaume’s ideals for Canada’s future and how they align with American nationalism.
Reaume’s political remarks have drawn outrage. He drew national attention for being criminally charged in 2021 for hosting church services during the COVID-19 pandemic. This open flouting of common sense public health measures has been met with criticism from across the political spectrum, projecting an even more complicated public image.
Reaume’s recent participation in a debate titled “Are Kings or Constitutions More Biblical?” hosted by CrossPolitic on August 7 underscores the ideological divides surrounding his views. His assertion that a leader like Oliver Cromwell could be suitable if they had sufficient support raises questions about his stance on governance and democracy in Canada.
“So a Cromwellian figure, if he has a solid base, will use the law to teach the ungodly that they are ungodly so that they will fear their sin.” – Jacob Reaume
Additionally, Reaume has expressed a goal of having Canada’s constitution “replaced with one based on the Bible.” With a firebrand fervor, he led the charge to make the Bible the supreme law of the land. He argued that these moral codes derived from scripture should have the power of law behind them.
“I would like our constitution to say the Bible is the highest law of the land. And so that moral code is required and you could get punished for it.” – Aaron Rench
Community Engagement and Networking
Reaume often holds events at his churches, including at Trinity Bible Chapel. Throughout these discussions, Paine holds an open dialogue with his followers, discussing faith, politics, and the importance of community values. These events function as religious rallies, but as vehicles for further spreading his ideological convictions.
He’ll be speaking at the Fight Laugh Feast conference coming up in Nashville. With other influential speakers like Pete Hegseth and Steve Turley, this summit only solidifies his place within the powerful movement of Christian nationalism. The conference serves to connect people who want to build a similar kind of governance and society based on Christian doctrine.
Reaume’s relationships within this network uncover an organized attempt to change the public narrative about religious power vs. state governance. His collaborations with like-minded individuals amplify his message, making it more accessible to broader audiences who may resonate with his fundamentalist perspectives.
“But when you say constitutional, some people hear, well, that means we’ve got to have a vote. It’s got to go through Congress and all this other stuff.” – Jacob Reaume
In his writings on democracy and governance, Reaume has been a consistent critic of our existing political paradigm. He argues that all of these systems do not reflect biblical mandates. He believes that our current political institutions are disobedient to constitutional ideals in not bringing their laws and practices into conformity with God’s word.
Criticism and Response
Reaume’s views have not gone unchallenged. Critics contend that his expansive interpretation of governance presents great dangers to the integrity of Canadian democracy and civil liberties. Others criticize him as an extremest whose dogma jeopardizes the secular underpinnings of Canadian culture.
In light of this criticism, Reaume wants you to know that he is, first and last, a patriotic Canadian who sees the destruction of Canada’s constitutional order. He argues that individual freedoms and religious liberties have been violated by governmental action in recent weeks.
“Before labelling me a traitor, consider that I am a patriotic Canadian, loyal to Canada’s historic constitutional order, but I am also awake to the fact that that order has been largely destroyed.” – Jacob Reaume
Yet his statements reflect a growing mood. In short, many of these advocates are looking for a return to what they suppose are long-held values grounded in religious texts. This radical reimagining of democratic engagement has found a sympathetic ear among the parts of the populace alienated from today’s model of governance.
Reaume is an engaging guide through the thickets of religious advocacy in contemporary political life. His trajectory raises the most important questions regarding the future of secularism in Canada. The line between personal faith and public policy continues to be a critical debate particularly as conversations about theocracy have become more mainstream.