Former President Donald Trump has been making waves by allegedly denouncing the “genuine starvation” occurring in Gaza. He is calling upon the Israeli government to allow “all the food that’s possible” into the territory. In all likelihood, this change in Trump’s rhetoric is pretty big. He has been criticized in the past for his unwavering support of Israel in the midst of these violations during active conflicts.
At a recent New York City press conference, Trump made a big show over the immediate crisis in Gaza. He said, “We can save more lives, I mean little kids. That’s actual starvation, I see it and you can’t pretend that. So we’re going to do even more.” His remarks come as a chorus of global humanitarian advocates express increasing alarm. Americans are correctly outraged at the level of suffering civilians in Gaza are facing right now.
Trump went on to criticize Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for saying there is no starvation in Gaza. He noted that Israel bears “significant responsibility” for the crisis today. He called on the Israeli government to reconsider its “anti-peace” policy toward the region. “I’m saying, you’ve got to do something about it.” I told Bibi he’s got to do this differently now,” said Trump using Netanyahu’s nickname.
In response, the former president called on the U.S. and its allies to establish “walk-in” food centers in Gaza. Another point he pressed on was that these centers must be barrier-free. This initiative is to make sure critical supplies get to those who need them most directly. We’re very nice, and we’re giving money, and we’re giving food, but we’re over here. I want him to make damn sure they’re getting that food. And I want to make darn sure that they get the food because every single ounce of food really counts! He warned that the current state is severe.
Here’s what Trump actually said about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He denounced Hamas for failing to continue releasing the remaining hostages, calling the terrorist organization “a very tough negotiator.” His remarks are indicative of a deepening ire with the group as violence rises between Israeli settlers and the Palestinian residents of the West Bank.
On the home front, Trump turned the tables. He advised UK Labour leader Keir Starmer to reduce taxes and focus on illegal immigration if he aspires to win the next general election. He argued that the candidate who provides the best economic conditions and demonstrates competence on immigration issues will emerge victorious. “The one who cuts taxes the most, the one who gives you the lowest energy prices and the best kind of energy, the one that keeps you out of wars … I think the one that’s toughest and most competent on immigration is going to win the election,” Trump asserted.
Trump faced massive protests throughout his visit to Scotland. He was due to have lunch at his second Scottish golf course, in Aberdeenshire. Some 100 protesters assembled in Balmedie carrying Palestinian flags and shouting, “You’re not welcome here.” The protesters were there to protest against Trump’s disregard towards the Palestinian people and his support for attacks on Gaza.
Trump criticized Vladimir Putin today. Just as importantly, he denounced the airstrikes that are now killing hundreds of innocent civilians in Ukraine. We thought we had that problem fixed several times. Then, suddenly, starting February 24, President Putin starts shooting rockets into cities including Kyiv and killing so many civilians, including those in a nursing home. His comments highlight an increasing impatience with Russia’s military course.
Trump announced that he would impose sanctions on Russia’s trading partners within 10-12 days if no ceasefire occurs in Ukraine. In return, he announced that he would bring his 50-day deadline for a ceasefire forward. This moment is unique and calls for extraordinary action. We cannot become passive observers to atrocities, to innocent civilians being murdered,” he said.
Yet as Trump steers these multifaceted international and domestic wounds, his pull continues to be deeply felt across the political landscape of America. Observers are gravely concerned by what his words and deeds will do to mold public sentiment, not to mention the future political arena.