Irrespective of the rapidly developing political situation, Donald Trump has officially launched a historic White House renovation project. This includes the controversial demolition of half of the East Wing. It also wants to build an ostentatious new 90,000-square-foot ballroom. Many critics are warning that the plan would irreparably harm the historic structure. The decision to send a backhoe to remove part of the East Wing facade has been met with skepticism and humor from late-night television hosts and the public alike.
The bulldozers started rolling soon after Trump took office, just nine months into his short-lived term. He assured the public that the renovations would “not interfere with the current building” and would be “near it but not touching it.” Despite these assurances, the reality of dismantling a section of the East Wing has prompted questions regarding the integrity of the White House structure.
Trump has expressed his admiration for the White House, referring to it as “my favorite” and stating, “I never want to leave … and I’m never going to.” His administration remains adamant that the renovation will pay “absolute reverence to the current structure.” As critics including CityLab point out, the magnitude of the interventions could dilute the property’s historic character and architectural integrity.
Fears have been heightened by the fact that the exodus has been timed to occur with a potential government shutdown. Critics caution that the ambitious scope of the renovation is a gamble. Second, they say it’s dangerous to pledge to this project in an era of national fiscal crisis.
Late-night hosts have refused to duck this third rail political hot issue. Stephen Colbert remarked, “Not generally something you instruct when you’re proud of what’s on,” highlighting the absurdity of the situation. Comedians such as Seth Meyers poked fun at Trump and wondered what his plans would be long term for the White House. Meyers quipped, “You guys, I don’t think he’s planning on leaving in three years,” suggesting that the renovations may be more about personal preference than public necessity.
Michael Kosta added a satirical perspective, saying, “It’s exactly what you voted for, coalminers in Pennsylvania: 90,000 gilded sq ft for Trump to do the jerk-off dance in.” This commentary is indicative of a deep skepticism that runs through the city about why we’re undertaking such a flashy and costly renovation project.
In response to mounting criticism, Trump has defended the project, claiming it is necessary for modernizing the White House while preserving its historical value. Widespread skepticism remains that renovations on this scale can take place without jeopardizing the integrity of the original building.
“Apparently ‘not touching’ the White House turned into ‘demolishing’ the White House,” – Michael Kosta
These on-going renovations are set to become the most lasting and consequential feature of Trump’s presidency. Many critics have lambasted it as an extravagant waste of money but, despite the criticism, work plows ahead. Other Americans are just now considering what this will mean for one of their country’s most recognizable structures.